| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sinner
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:15 pm Post subject: Hard starting w/ E85 |
|
|
As it gets cooler, I am having a harder time starting my 2004 Ford Taurus FFV. When I have E-10 in the tank it starts right up, with E85 it gets a bit scary. I almost gave up this morning on getting it started.
Anyone else? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lgodave
Joined: 01 Sep 2005 Posts: 28 Location: WI
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:23 pm Post subject: How cold? |
|
|
Hi,
What kind of temp. is it outside when you have this "cold start" problem?
I'm not sure when stations start rolling out "Winter Blend" Gasoline and E85... but since Winter Blend E85 is actually more like E70... You may want to add a bit more gasoline to your Tank until "Winter Blend" E85 becomes more common. Hopefully that fixes the problem.
If running E70 or less continues to cause problems you may have to verify your Vehicle's Fuel System, etc. is working OK.
Is your Fuel Filter due for a change? Not that it's a problem, but changing it every few years is cheap insurance againest any number of issues. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sinner
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the reply!
It is getting to be a bit colder here in the orning, but I had touble in the middle of the afternoon at about 78 degrees...
I guess it's time for another visit to my "friendly" Ford dealer...
I will stop at a E10 pump on the way home an top off the tank. I will let all yall know if that helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A short term work around until you can get it fixed by the Ford dealer is in cold weather, add a couple gallons of gasoline per tankful.
On my converted WRX is makes a huge difference in cold start.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Revision
Joined: 14 Sep 2005 Posts: 194 Location: Carol Stream, IL
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What is it about ethanol that makes a harder cold start?
Is it because the vapor pressure is lower so it doesn't atomize properly in colder weather?
I know that when I was tuning my TEC3 for winter cold start I had to add in a LOT of fuel in the cold start enrichment table to get it to start properly with regular fuel. Would it make sense that E85 has it worse? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edi
Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 14 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When it is cold the vapor pressure of fuel is smaller, because ethanol has too small vapor pressure than gasoline. Here in Germany Ford has for degrees under -15 °C an electric heating for the motor inside. Or people can take more gasoline to E85. May be also a little bit aceton or methylethylketone taking inside the fuel can help, so the vapor pressure oft the mixture increses.
Last edited by Edi on Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:08 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sinner
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 5 Gallons of E10 made a huge improvement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PumpingE85
Joined: 19 Jun 2005 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:13 pm Post subject: Hard starting Taurus and Explorer FFVs |
|
|
Guys:
Ford has been experiencing a little problem with (mostly) the 04 and 05 Taurus FFVs. They did away with the flex fuel module and now rely on exhaust gas sensors to 'back-calculate' engine settings. Some do not seem to work well in any temperature.
Unfortunately, some friendly service techs blame "the fuel." In reality, they are working on a recalibration. A technical service bulletin put out earlier this summer did not solve the problem.
Please do the following:
- report the problem to the dealer service dept.
- they should be working through the technical service hotline if they cannot diagnose the problem at the shop.
- if a couple of calls to the hotline do not solve the problem, they are suppose to involve the regional engineer in the problem (this can take awhile)
It seems that they do not always report the problem properly, so, no one up the change is seeing "statistically" all the problems.
Please push on your local service dept to report it properly -- or they may never get their act together.
Of course, you always threaten to trade it in on a new Chevy Impala or Monte Carlo FFV. No reports of problems with the GM/GMC systems -- they, too, have dropped the flex-fuel module.
Winter-blended E85 is entering the market now. You should NOT be experience starting problems at 40F or 78F!!! This is NOT a fuel issue. You could very well experience starting concerns if the vehicle is parked outside without a block heater for an extended period when temps are below 0F.
People in Sweden and International Falls, MN, don't seem to have a problem running E85. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sinner
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Do you have a link to info on the Ford issue, it sounds WAY too much like my recurring CEL problem on my 2004 Taurus |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
specialgreen Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jul 2004 Posts: 259 Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:25 pm Post subject: Re: Hard starting Taurus and Explorer FFVs |
|
|
| PumpingE85 wrote: | | =Winter-blended E85 is entering the market now. You should NOT be experience starting problems at 40F or 78F!!! |
From what info I could find, "E-85" is blended to 70% ethanol from November through March ( http://e85forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=14 ). Do you have any info on when blenders change over? Is in industry-wide, or does each blender decide on their own? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:55 pm Post subject: blend change |
|
|
I would suspect the change occurs about the same time that the emissions challenged areas are forced to go to winter blend oxygenated fuels.
I've seen a list of the dates for that will try to find it.
[edit] http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/oxy-area.pdf
Ball park it is from around October through about February but each region is slightly different. In most parts of the country the coldest winter temps are most likely from mid Nov through late February.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
specialgreen Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jul 2004 Posts: 259 Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting reading: seeing that most of the states which originally had the "winter oxygenated fuel" category are dropping it for weaker approaches, Minnesota has done just the opposite, and gone from a seasonal winter-blend to year-round state-wide E-10. And while other states pull back from oxygenated fuel, Minnesota is pushing for statewide E-20. It kind-of makes it look like Minnesota is "out in left field" (or is it right field? ... or maybe just "out standing in our field").
Maybe I'm not seeing something, but if we're serious about controlling our fuel supply, then the US should do a nationwide 5% ethanol blend. Even a 3% blend would make a difference in our energy policy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Maybe I'm not seeing something, but if we're serious about controlling our fuel supply, then the US should do a nationwide 5% ethanol blend. Even a 3% blend would make a difference in our energy policy. |
Generally I agree with you. Those local oxygenate mandates were only to control local pollution issues. Once they reached local emissions goals they had no reason to continue the special blending rules.
They also have the unfortunate secondary consequence of making it difficult to shift fuel supplys from one market to another, as the proper fuel blend for one location would not be legal to sell in a nearby market.
That is the reason Pres. Bush asked that the EPA regulations that force those localized blends be lifted temporarily following Hurricane Katrina, to allow shifting of fuel stocks to reduce the impacts of the temporary loss of refinery and fuel line capacity shut down by the storm.
A nation wide fuel standard would go a long way to avoiding regionalized high fuel prices. As it stands right now some markets are dependent on only a handful of suppliers/pipelines for thier fuel stocks. When there is an emergency that takes down those sources of supply you see issues like happened in Arizona last year where their fuel prices went sky high and supplies got very scarce.
As more ethanol plants come on line here in the next year or so, what your suggesting might be possible but at the moment I don't think the nationwide ethanol production could support a nation wide fuel mandate for ethanol usage as some areas have limited access, because the refiners do not like shipping fuel ethanol by pipe line as I understand it, to avoid contamination issues with other fuel products, that should not have any alcohol content.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
specialgreen Site Admin
Joined: 10 Jul 2004 Posts: 259 Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hotrod wrote: | | They also have the unfortunate secondary consequence of making it difficult to shift fuel supplys from one market to another, as the proper fuel blend for one location would not be legal to sell in a nearby market. |
I wonder if Minnesota is hurting more than helping by bumping-up from E-10 to E-20? That just makes it so much harder for a neighboring state (e.g. Iowa or maybe Nebraska) to make a unified blend with Minnesota. Perhaps the E-20 push is all brinksmanship: by publicizing the intent to use E-20, yet giving a far-future implementation date (2012), Pawlenty's bill may be simlpy pro-ethanol PR, and may actually help to get neighbor states to realize that ethanol is a useful and cost-competitive fuel blending agent.
| hotrod wrote: | | at the moment I don't think the nationwide ethanol production could support a nation wide fuel mandate for ethanol usage as some areas have limited access, because the refiners do not like shipping fuel ethanol by pipe line |
I hadn't thought of the shipping problem. That makes sense. Shipping fuel cross-country by truck would not be cost-effective. Even rail would be nowhere near is efficient as pipeline. Barges could be useful for shipping down the Mississippi, the same way that corn reaches international markets. Tankers would be needed to carry ethanol from the gulf port to the coasts. Such an infrastructure is not in place.
I wonder about the pipelines: I've read that ethanol can't ride normal pipelines because it would pick-up water and crud. If my carburetor is any example, that is only a temporary problem. Once the pipes are clean, subsequent flows of ethanol would not be so contaminated. Ethanol and crude oil are immiscible, so ethanol would always be more like water in the pipes than like crude oil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sinner
Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to update:
My 2004 Taurus FFV is now at the dealer for CEL. Armed with the knowledge in this thread, I am making them fix the problem. It has been there since opening and I just got a call from them saying that they will not finish tonight.
Must have made an impression!
Will let you all know what happens tomorrow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|