 |
E85Forum.com Fueling the E85 community
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a happy camper, I just ran the WRX through the Colorado emissions test with my new home made FFV setup, and passed with flying colors.
100% summer blend E85 with an extra 1.5 gallons of gasoline added to the summer blend, on Harvey's baseline tune, I have a single Spintech high flow cat in the exhaust now.
For those of you that don't know the Colorado emissions test is a driving cycle,(I/M 240 test) on an AWD dyno test so these are under driving condition tail pipe emissions on E85 .
http://www.aircarecolorado.com/im240tst.htm
Engine has 59K miles on it, with over 100 drag strip passes on it, no detectable oil consumption, converter is new.
| Code: |
............ reading .... limit ...
HC GPM 0.3335 1.20000
CO GPM 3.9638 20.00000
CO2 GPM 414.3504 -- NA ---
NOx GPM 1.9216 3.00000
|
The National Center for Vehicle Emissions Control and Safety at Colorado State University has done extensive testing of in-use vehicles and their converters. Part of the testing included the development of converter feedgas charts for fuel-injected and carbureted vehicles (see CO, HC and NOx feedgas charts below).
gpm = grams of pollutant per mile driven
| Code: |
Fuel injected 4 cyl
HC ~= 1.0 - 2.0 gpm
CO ~= 10 - 15 gpm
NOx ~= 1.3 - 2.0 gpm
|
Based on those numbers my NOx is a tad high so I will richen up my tune a bit as HC & CO is well under control.
Also a richer mixture is better for a max performance tune on E85. Once I get my water injection setup re-installed that will also drop NOx a considerable amount.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fredster
Joined: 20 Nov 2006 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hotrod wrote: | | I'm a happy camper, I just ran the WRX through the Colorado emissions test with my new home made FFV setup, and passed with flying colors. |
good for you ...
although it ain't surprising ... as the e85 supposed to be more clean burning gas _________________ I guess Hubert Reeves thinks this is an important matter
Cost of Can. Gov. studies on global warming ? xx M$
Cost of industrial scientific studies for alternative energy sources ? x M$
Cost of a 100$ batch of distilled ethanol ?
Priceless |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
A cautionary note for anyone playing with E85 seeking to copy my home made FFV project. After some testing today, I think I would have to issue a strong caution to using the "autotune mode" if you are running any significant boost levels (over 8-12 psi).
As you know, I recently have been running a bit lean, and part of that was due to the recent change over from winter to summer blend E85. Well I managed to scare myself today! I have recently been exploring fuel economy issues with the E85, using the midrange fuel pressure setting and let the system use LTFT's only to handle the E85, starting from a safe tune at a 50/50 gasoline-E85 blend. The result is, I made a few too many tweaks to lean the mixture out, working entirely in the low boost range.
I first did a bit of logging and found that driving like a normal human being in daily traffic, I rarely went over 2-3 psi boost in typical city traffic. On the few occasions that I did, I seldom was on boost long enough to get over about 8 psi boost (this was in economy driving mode, ie easy into the throttle avoiding WOT squirts).
I have been driving on the summer blend E85 now for a couple weeks so all the fuel trims had fully stabilized and today was a nice cool day with some light sprinkles of rain, so I thought it was a good time to do a couple of WOT runs and see what was happening under those conditions.
I found that I was running lambda 1.02 ( 15:1 gasoline AFR) all the way up to 18 psi. Eeeeeekk!
Needless to say it did not take me long to get out and crank up the fuel pressure to 55 psi. That dropped my Lambda under WOT open loop down to 0.82.
The good news is, I was expecting it to be a bit too lean, so had been purposely avoiding flogging on the car hard. I was also so lean I was over on the lean side of the high detonation mixtures. No harm no foul, but just a red flag and a word to the wise, it is easy to get so carried away "tweaking the system" that you go a bit too far!
All that said, I think it still has some possibilities for folks that are willing to run low boost or NA setups strictly for the true FFV capabilities but I would not recommend it now, especially on the summer blend E85 if you like to run the car hard.
Autotune would work fine if you also had a water injection setup however.
The other observation is that the single best thing you can do to increase your fuel milage is to change your boost curve! I have a Blitz DSBC which has 4 settings (channels) and I can set the boost gain independently on these channels. By running a very low gain on the first channel I can create a situation where in day to day driving my boost seldom gets up above 3-6 psi and a full WOT pull will only go up to about 1/2 of the max boost limit I have set. Then by simply twisting the knob to channel 2 which has a higher gain on it I have a normal agressive boost profile.
Using the low gain setup I bumped my fuel milage from 18 mpg to almost 24 mpg with no other changes. In short agressive quick spooling boost curves are your enemy if your looking for good fuel milage.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alcohol
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 634 Location: Central Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hotrod- do you have any exhaust gas temp monitoring devices on this car? Have you looked at the spark plugs for lean indication? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Hotrod- do you have any exhaust gas temp monitoring devices on this car? Have you looked at the spark plugs for lean indication? |
I have a new EGT gauge but have not installed it yet.
No need to look for lean indications, I was getting lean backfire into the intake on acceleration, so not much doubt about that.
My NOx readings were higher than the CO and HC during the emissions test.
Co and HC were both in the lower third, but NOx at 2/3'rds of the allowable range. NOx is only produced at high combustion temps, and the AFR's on the wide band all indicate I was quite lean (which was what I expected --- just not quite that much ). That is why I was keeping boost quite low as a safety cushion.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alcohol
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 634 Location: Central Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you Larry- I was curious what your indicators were. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BravoFox
Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 2 Location: South Africa
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Larry.
I am glad to see someone playing on a Scooby with E85.
I myself drive a 2006 Impreza 2.0R(Australian Spec).
Basically the same 2 liter engine as your WRX but only N/A.
Myself cannot start to play with this, as E85 is not available yet in South Africa. But should not be that far away...
My only question at this stage, do you have any concerns that the ethanol will deteriorate your fuel system?
I know this is a basic E85 question that maybe needed to be asked elsewhere, but I’d like to hear your opinion since you also drive a Subaru. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | My only question at this stage, do you have any concerns that the ethanol will deteriorate your fuel system? |
No at this point my concern about that is essentially zero. I have run the car on blends of E85 for something like 3 years and nearly 2 years on 100% E85 most of the time. This last winter I cut out a section of rubber fuel line when I did some upgrade work on the fuel system (bigger injectors etc.)
It was the fuel line that went from the under hood fuel filter to the fuel hard lines under the manifold. This section of hose came with the car new in spring of 2001, I pulled it out in early winter 2007, after almost 5 years exposure to high blends of E85 and 6 years of exposure to under hood temperatures.
I slit the fuel line lengthwise and opened it up. The interior of the hose looked and felt like a brand new hose. The rubber was clean, smooth and showed no signs of gummy surface or cracks or swelling. It looked exactly like you would expect a new piece of hose to look.
I then let it dry out for about a week and then did a double back test by bending it 180 degrees with the inside of the hose on the outside of the bend, and it still showed no signs of cracking, crazing, hardening or any other problem you care to imagine.
Same with my fuel injector O-rings, they looked and felt perfectly normal.
At least on the USDM WRX (2002 model year and following) the rubber used in the fuel system has no detectable problems with E85 over an extended test interval.
I have not heard of a single complaint from anyone else either regarding fuel system issues on the Subaru's.
I think you should have no problems.
Is there signs that your country will be developing a domestic fuel source using something line E85 and biodiesel ?
What crops would you expect to be used in your area to produce bio-fuels?
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BravoFox
Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 2 Location: South Africa
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow! That is great to hear. After 5 years and no visible damage is great news.
Obviously, once I can get E85, I will not be able to directly apply your recipe because of the non-turbo design, but it should be possible to get it done in the end.
| hotrod wrote: |
Is there signs that your country will be developing a domestic fuel source using something line E85 and biodiesel ?
What crops would you expect to be used in your area to produce bio-fuels?
|
Our country, in the past, always had big carry-over stocks of maize. In 2005, many maize producers were knocked down hard, because the huge stockpile caused obscenely low prices that made farming non-viable. (Our government does not subsidies us)
It was in this time that the concept was greatly pushed by producers and the building of 8 ethanol plants over the country was suggested.
Sadly, at this stage the government is dragging its feet with legislation and not even the fist plant is completed. (Guess you have heard about the concept “Africa Time”? )
But with the recent sharp rises in fuel prices (In April we had the sharpest rise in this country’s history) this should be gaining more momentum.
Sorghum and sugar-cane is also considered as sources, but like in the USA maize will be the main source.
There are also plans for Bio-Diesel from Sunflower and Soya.
I would though like to produce my own ethanol on small scale, as I am a maize farmer myself… |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|