| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
seanmathes
Joined: 29 Apr 2009 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:20 pm Post subject: TWIN TURBO 2001 MUSTANG ON E85!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
I am trying to finish up my E85 conversion on my twin turbo GT and need some help. I have been trying to get help over on turboforums but haven't really gotten what I am looking for. Here is the short version of the story behind the car. When on gas this car was approaching 1000 RWHP according to the dyno sheets. Yes I did personally see the dyno sheets but did not actually witness the dynos as it was before I had the car. I bought the car several months ago and wanted to convert to E85.
I have changed the injectors from 60lb siemens deka to the high impedance Ford racing 80 lb injectors. The car is now tuned and was dynod again yesterday. We weren't able to go above 15psi as the car really started to lean out under boost. We weren't sure exactly what was going on and tried adding more fuel to the tune but still stayed lean. So we are pretty sure that the pump is not supplying enough fuel. I watched the fuel pressure gauge during the pull and it would build to about 60 psi and completely drop off back to about 50 as boost increased (thus the reason for the lean condtion).
So now I am thinking I definitely need a larger pump. I am planning on going with the Magnafuel PRO Tuner 750. I am currently running a full aeromotive fuel system with an A1000.
Can anyone give me any input on my setup and tell me if they think this is the best way to go?
On the dyno we hit 775 RWHP at 15.6 PSI and we were too lean so backed it way off.
I want to run this car at a minimum of 20 psi and maybe go as high as 30 psi. Thanks for any advice.
Sean
PS. Here is the thread on turboforums if anyone would like more info about the car.
http://www.theturboforums.com/smf/index.php?topic=126321.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Turbo98
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Misouri
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I didn't read the rhread yet over on Turbomustangs but you could be running out of injector. What was the injector duty cycle? According to some quick calculations, it appears that could easily be the case. The blend of E85 could slightly affect this also. Are you running an auto too? That would sap even more power. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Turbo98
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Misouri
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ok. I read through all the stuff on your thread over there. I'm sure you will need to upgrade the pump and injectors. They are both probably maxed out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seanmathes
Joined: 29 Apr 2009 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: INJECTORS |
|
|
Yea I think you are right. I just datalogged on Saturday and finally plugged in the numbers for the dutycycle and they are totally maxed out at 15psi. Really really frustrating as my tuner though we would be ok with the 80s. So do you think the 120s will definitely be big enough even if I got high 20s boost? thanks for your help.
Sean |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Turbo98
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Misouri
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok. A couple things. The amount of boost really doesn't matter with regard to the injectors as much as it does the fuel pump. It will affect injector size if you are trying to stretch the injectors by increasing the base fuel pressure for more injector flow. This is because whatever boost pressure you run, you have to add this to the base pressure to come up with the total amount of fuel pressure under boost. So if you have to run your base pressure at 55 PSI for example in order to get more flow out of your injectors, and you are runnning 30 PSI of boost, your fuel pressure will be around 85 PSI under boost. This is important because as the fuel pressure goes up, pump flow goes down. So, you need to size your pump based on the FP you determine you will be running. Most pump manufacturers have a flow chart available at different pressures so you can see. I can tell you that the A1000 is not enough for your car. I've looked at their flow chart before and it just doesn't do too well under higher pressures.
How much power are you looking to make? This will determine your injector size. Not so much the amount of boost.
Now.... I noticed something on your 713rwhp dyno sheet. It said "SAE 1.23" at the bottom. You're in Denver so I am assuming this is a huge correction factor applied to these numbers. So, if you take out the correction factor, the car is making 580rwhp at the dyno at your location. This is important because this is the amount of fuel you're using to make the power BEFORE any correction factor is applied. So if you are looking to make a CORRECTED dyno number of 1000rwhp, you can do so with smaller injectors than if you didn't have the correction factor. You may just do it with the 120# injectors according to what I can tell. It will be close if the base FP is 43 PSI (the FP in which the injectors are rated at). But I don't think you will make an uncorrected 1000rwhp with the 120's at the rated 43 PSI base FP. If you increase the base pressure to 55 PSI though, you can stretch them to flow another 12%. This would probably get you to the 1000rwhp mark CORRECTED.
Hope all that makes sense. Sorry for the long post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Now.... I noticed something on your 713rwhp dyno sheet. It said "SAE 1.23" at the bottom. You're in Denver so I am assuming this is a huge correction factor applied to these numbers. So, if you take out the correction factor, the car is making 580rwhp at the dyno at your location. |
Correct --- the correction factors used on dynos at high altitude are only appropriate for NA engines they give about 2x the proper correction here in Denver. Experience has shown that the proper correction for a turbocharged car here in Denver is near 1.15, when the dyno wants to give you a 1.20 -1.24 correction.
As stated above your raw power at the crank shaft is the number you need to use to figure out your fuel requirements as fuel demand is directly proportional to power developed. If your only source of information is a chassis dyno, on a 2 wheel drive car take the uncorrected power at the wheels an multiply by 1.15 to estimate your crankshaft power. On an AWD setup, you need to multiply your chassis dyno wheel power by 1.20-1.25 to get engine power levels since the AWD system has more losses.
BSFC on E85 on most boosted engines seems to be about 0.77 - 0.80 lb of fuel per hp, compared to about 0.5 lb/hp for gasoline. To be safe put a fuel pump in that is 1.5-1.6x more flow that they would recommend for gasoline at the same power level.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seanmathes
Joined: 29 Apr 2009 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks guys that was really great and way more than I have gotten so far over at turbo forums. So I am planning on going with the magnafuel protuner 750 unless you guys think that is overkill. I talked to the guy at Magnafuel and he seemed to think it would be appropriate but warned me of the possibility of needing a fuel cooler to avoid vapor lock. I might as well go bigger as the 4301 is not that much cheaper.
Honestly I really don't know what power I am trying to make. I have this motor that was putting out approximately 1000 HP at 30psi of boost when it was originally built in Texas. That is the only thing that I have to go off of. My plan is to try to run it at a minimum of 20 psi for now. On saturday on the dyno it put down 775 RWHP at 15.6 psi so I don't think a couple hundred more is out of the question. My next step is definitely upgrading the pump and then will see where I'm at with the injectors and may try them at a higher rail pressure. Thanks again and I look forward to hearing more input.
Sean |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Turbo98
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Misouri
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hotrod wrote: | | Quote: | | Now.... I noticed something on your 713rwhp dyno sheet. It said "SAE 1.23" at the bottom. You're in Denver so I am assuming this is a huge correction factor applied to these numbers. So, if you take out the correction factor, the car is making 580rwhp at the dyno at your location. |
Correct --- the correction factors used on dynos at high altitude are only appropriate for NA engines they give about 2x the proper correction here in Denver. Experience has shown that the proper correction for a turbocharged car here in Denver is near 1.15, when the dyno wants to give you a 1.20 -1.24 correction.
|
Yeah, I have seen formulas that show the correction factor should be even less than 15%. The ones on the dyno are WAY too much for turbo cars for sure. The main thing is that he needs to look at his injector size in relation to the UNCORRECTED HP numbers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Turbo98
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Misouri
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Post the specs on that fuel pump your looking at (flow at different pressures) and we can see how it will perform. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tech @ BG
Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you are boost referencing the regulator keep in mind with your fuel pump that you will need to have one that makes more fuel pressure then your base plus your boost. For example if you are running your base fuel pressure at 50 psi and trying to run 15 lbs of boost your fuel presure requirement would be the 50 + 15 for 65 total. For the horsepower range you are looking to be in and the amount of boost you might get to you will probably need to look at a much higher end pump then what you are currently looking at or even going into a belt driven application. _________________ Technical Support
Barry Grant Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tech @ BG
Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also keep in mind that as the pressure increases the volume will decrease. _________________ Technical Support
Barry Grant Inc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Honestly I really don't know what power I am trying to make. I have this motor that was putting out approximately 1000 HP at 30psi of boost when it was originally built in Texas. |
The easiest way to deal with that is to understand that the engine power output is limited to some maximum value by the maximum amount of air you can stuff in the engine. No matter what you do, you will not exceed that limit.
Look at your turbo compressor maps and determine the maximum amount of air they are physically able to flow at the maximum boost you expect to run. Then put enough fuel pump in it to supply enough fuel to burn that air.
Here are some ballpark numbers for gasoline. Since E85 supplies some oxygen in the fuel, figure your maximum power is about 1.15 x these values. That should get you in the ball park.
Conversions used where I had control over conversion factors:
1 HP approx equals 1.45 CFM
1 CFM approx equals 0.0745 lb of air/min
0.108 Lb/min of air approx equals 1 hp
1 Meter cubed/sec of air = 35.314 CFS = 2118.867 CFM
1 KG/sec of air= 132 lbs/min approx equals 1771.812 CFM
For example the stock turbo on my WRX had a max flow limit of about 405 CFM at peak flow. That divided by 1.45 CFM comes out to 279 hp. That is very close to the maximum power you can deliver to the wheels in that car on gasoline with the stock turbo. On racing gasoline a handful of people got up to 300 hp but the engine did not live long as the air charge was really hot. Figuring the drive train loss at 25% then the engine could not make more than 350 hp at the crank on gasoline on the stock turbo.
My engine had a BSFC of about .59 lb/hp/hr on gasoline so it needed 206 lbs of fuel an hour to make that power level. Since gasoline weighs about 6.5 lbs/gallon that meant I needed a fuel pump that would deliver 31.7 gallons per hour. Fuel pumps for my car are rated in liters/hr, so with a gallon equal to 3.8 liters I needed a fuel pump that flowed 120 liters/hr of gasoline to feed the engine on the stock turbo. The stock fuel pump was good for about 180 l/hr, so on the stock turbo with gasoline, no change was necessary. Run that same turbo and engine on E85 you have the following:
405 CFM / 1.45 = 279 hp at the wheels,
power gain due to E85 15% = 321 at the wheels.
drive train loss = 25%, so 1.25 x 321 = 402 hp at the crank
BSFC for E85 = .8 lbs/hr/hp
402 x .8 = 321 lbs/hr
E85 weighs about 6.6 lbs/gallon = 48.6 gallons per hour
convert to liters per hour (48.6 x 3.8 = 184 liters per hour)
This is running the stock fuel pump at max flow (very bad idea as in the real world due to voltage drops and high boost pressures it probably could not get over perhaps 160 l/hr)
So I went to a 255 l/hr aftermarket pump. Now I had a reasonable cushion for the power level I could conceivably make on that turbo.
If I went to an after market turbo that was good for 600 hp plus I would need to jump up to double pumps to be sure I could feed the engine.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Turbo98
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Misouri
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I glanced at Magnafuel's web site and couldn't find any flow data. I would have them e-mail you a chart with flows at different pressures. To make a blanket statement that they will support 2000HP doesn't mean much. Take into consideration that you are running E85 and require higher pump pressures due to boost, we need to see the flow rates. Foe example, they say it can support UP TO 2000HP. That's flywheel to start. So take off 300HP right off the bat. Assume worse case that it takes 40% more flow of the E85 to make your power. That puts it down to around 1200rwhp. That's at 40 PSI. So say you are running a base pressure of 50 PSI and 30 PSI boost, that's 80 PSI pump pressure required. Who knows how much it will flow at that pressure but one thing is for sure--that's double the pressure. So you could be down to borderline 1000rwhp. Plus it doesn't say they are compatible with any alcohols. I'm sure at this point you want to be sure and only want to buy one more pump! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hotrod
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 872 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also remember fuel pump flow varies with both pressure and supply voltage, good large gauge wiring to the fuel pumps is a very good idea. Ask them for flow charts at supply voltages (typically 13.8 v). Measure the voltage at the pump under full load to make sure you have enough juice to drive the pumps at full rated output.
On high power setups some folks even use a voltage stabilizer module that guarantees the pump see 14.2 Volts or what ever their ideal voltage supply is. It makes the pump run cooler and last longer too.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seanmathes
Joined: 29 Apr 2009 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:50 am Post subject: drinking through a firehose |
|
|
Can you say trying to drink from a firehose I will need a bit to digest all of this. First thing in the morning I will try to get flow specs. I can't thank you guys enough you have been great. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|